|
Cleanup Options
Click the "show" or "hide" arrow on the right side of the bar to display or hide the content of each subsection.
| Evaluate Applicable Cleanup Alternatives for the Site |
 |
The review and analysis of cleanup alternatives relies on the data collected
during the site assessment
and investigation phases, which are
discussed in the preceding sections of the Road Map. The purpose of evaluating
various technologies is to identify those technologies with the capability
to meet specific cleanup and redevelopment objectives. For brownfields
sites, it also is important to consider budget requirements and to maintain
a work schedule so that the project remains financially viable.
Institutional controls also are an important consideration during this
phase. Examples of such legal and administrative requirements include
easements, covenants, zoning restrictions, and the posting of advisories
to increase community awareness of the environmental conditions and cleanup
activities at the site. See Spotlight 16, Understanding
the Role of Institutional Controls at Brownfields Sites, for more
information about institutional controls.
| What Do We Need to Know? |
 |
Factors that should be considered during the evaluation of cleanup options
include:
- How do we determine the appropriate and feasible level of cleanup?
Are there federal, state, local, and tribal requirements for cleanup?
Should risk-based approaches be considered as an option for assessing
exposure (see the definition of risk-based corrective action [RBCA]
in List of Acronyms and Glossary
of Key Terms)? Are there prescribed standards for cleanup? Are there
provisions for using presumptive remedies?
- What factors are associated with the implementation of cleanup options?
Will the cleanup facilitate or hinder the planned redevelopment? How
long will cleanup take? What will cleanup cost? What are the short-term
and long-term effects of the cleanup technologies under consideration?
- Are the cleanup options compatible with regional or local planning
and development goals and requirements? Can redevelopment activities
(such as construction or renovation of buildings) be conducted concurrently
with cleanup?
- How can the community participate in the review and selection of cleanup
options? Are the options acceptable in light of community concerns about
protection during cleanup and reuse of the site? What environmental
standards should be considered to ensure that community stakeholders
are satisfied with the outcome and process of cleanup, given the intended
reuse?
- Is there a need for institutional controls after cleanup? Are proposed
institutional controls appropriate in light of community concerns and
access to and use of the property? Will institutional controls facilitate
or hinder development? What plans, including financial assurances, are
being made to ensure that institutional controls remain in place as
long as contamination is present?
- What options are available to monitor the performance of cleanup technologies?
| How Do We Find the Answers? |
 |
The process of reviewing and analyzing cleanup options and technology
alternatives usually follows these steps:
- Establish goals for cleanup that consider the end use and use applicable
standards, published state or federal guidelines, RBCAs, or site-specific
risk assessment results
- Educate members of the community about the site cleanup selection
process and actively involve them in decision-making
- Review general information about cleanup technologies to become familiar
with those that may be applicable to a particular site:
- Use the resources in this publication
- See Table A-3, Technologies
for Treating Contaminants Found at Brownfields Sites, for examples
of technologies that are appropriate for specific types of contaminants
- Conduct searches of existing literature that further describes
the technology alternatives
- Analyze detailed technical information about the applicability
of technology alternatives
- Narrow the list of potential technologies that are most appropriate
for addressing the contamination identified at the site and that are
compatible with the specific conditions of the site and the proposed
reuse of the property:
- Network with other brownfields stakeholders and environmental
professionals to learn about their experiences and to tap their
expertise
- Determine whether sufficient data are available to support
identification and evaluation of cleanup alternatives
- Evaluate the options against a number of factors, including
toxicity levels, exposure pathways, associated risks, future land
use, and economic considerations
- Analyze the applicability of a particular technology to the
contamination identified at a site
- Determine the effects of various technology alternatives on
redevelopment objectives
- Continue to work with appropriate regulatory agencies to ensure that
regulatory requirements are addressed properly:
- Consult with the appropriate federal, state, local, and tribal
regulatory agencies to include them in the decision-making process
as early as possible
- Contact the EPA
regional brownfields coordinator to identify and determine the
availability of EPA support programs
- Integrate cleanup alternatives with reuse alternatives to identify
potential constraints on reuse and time schedules and to assess cost
and risk factors
- To provide a measure of certainty and stability to the project, investigate
environmental insurance policies, such as protection against cost overruns,
undiscovered contamination, and third-party litigation, and integrate
their cost into the project financial package
- Select an acceptable remedy that not only achieves cleanup goals and
addresses the risk of contamination, but also best meets the objectives
for redevelopment and reuse of the property and is compatible with the
needs of the community
- Communicate information about the proposed cleanup option to brownfields
stakeholders, including the affected community
| Where Do We Find Answers to Our Technology Questions? |
 |
Show all resources as one list
Examples of resources that will assist in reviewing and analyzing cleanup
options are listed below.
A. Resources for Cleanup Options
The documents listed below are resources that provide general information
about the availability of technology resources in the form of bibliographies,
status reports, and user guides.
ASTM Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites E1739-95e1(2003) |
| The purpose of the guide is to define RBCA as a process for assessing and responding to a petroleum release in a manner that ensures the protection of human health and the environment. The guide will assist brownfields decision-makers who wish to become familiar with another approach that can be used to assess environmental risk at a site, in conformity with applicable federal, state, local, and tribal regulations. The diversity and flexibility of a RBCA approach is defined and discussed, and the tiered approach of the process is summarized. Although the RBCA process is not limited to a particular site, the guide emphasizes the use of RBCA in response to releases of petroleum. Examples of RBCA applications also are provided. The guide, which is available at a cost, can be ordered online at www.astm.org. |
| Breaking Barriers to the Use of Innovative Technologies: State Regulatory Role in Unexploded Ordnance Detection and Characterization Technology Selection |
| The report, which was published in 2000 by the ITRC, contains an analysis of case studies from states having experience in remediating UXO-contaminated sites. The report supports early and meaningful state regulatory involvement in the selection of innovative UXO characterization and remediation technologies. The report also offers recommendations to ensure the appropriate participation of states in the selection of technologies for characterizing and remediating UXO-contaminated sites. |
Brownfields Technology Primer: Requesting and Evaluating Proposals that Encourage Innovative Technologies for Investigation and Cleanup EPA 542-R-01-005 |
| See also: |
http://brownfieldstsc.org/pubs02.cfm |
| BTSC prepared this primer to assist site owners, project managers, and others preparing RFPs to solicit support in conducting activities to investigate and clean up contaminated sites. It is specifically intended to assist those individuals in writing specifications that encourage contractors and technology vendors to propose options for using innovative characterization and remediation technologies at brownfields sites. The primer also provides information, from a technology perspective, to guide review teams in their evaluations of proposals and the selection of qualified contractors. |
| Citizen's Guides to Understanding Innovative Treatment Technologies |
| The guides are prepared by EPA to provide site managers with nontechnical outreach materials that they can share with communities in the vicinity of sites. The guides present information on innovative technologies that have been selected or applied at some cleanup sites, provide overviews of the technologies, and present success stories about sites at which innovative technologies have been applied. Both English and Spanish versions of the guides are available. The guides contain information on the following subjects: |
| – |
Activated carbon treatment (EPA 542-F-01-020) |
| – |
Air stripping (EPA 542-F-01-016) |
| – |
Bioremediation (EPA 542-F-01-001) |
| – |
Capping (EPA 542-F-01-022) |
| – |
Chemical dehalogenation (EPA 542-F-01-010) |
| – |
Chemical oxidation (EPA 542-F-01-013) |
| – |
Fracturing (EPA 542-F-01-015) |
| – |
In situ flushing (EPA 542-F-01-011) |
| – |
In situ thermal treatment methods (EPA 542-F-01-012) |
| – |
Incineration (EPA 542-F-01-018) |
| – |
Monitored natural attenuation (EPA 542-F-01-004) |
| – |
Permeable reactive barriers (EPA 542-F-01-005) |
| – |
Phytoremediation (EPA 542-F-01-002) |
| – |
Pump and treat (EPA 542-F-01-025) |
| – |
Soil excavation (EPA 542-F-01-023) |
| – |
Soil vapor extraction (SVE) and air sparging (EPA 542-F-01-006) |
| – |
Soil washing (EPA 542-F-01-008) |
| – |
Solidification/stabilization (EPA 542-F-01-024) |
| – |
Solvent extraction (EPA 542-F-01-009) |
| – |
Thermal desorption (EPA 542-F-01-003) |
| – |
Vitrification (EPA 542-F-01-017) |
| Clean-Up Information Home Page on the World Wide Web (CLU-IN) |
| The Internet site, which was developed by EPA, provides information about innovative treatment technologies and site characterization technologies to the hazardous waste remediation community. CLU-IN describes programs, organizations, publications, and other tools for EPA and other federal and state personnel, consulting engineers, technology developers and vendors, remediation contractors, researchers, community groups, and individual citizens. Information about issues related to remediation and site characterization also is provided: technology verification and evaluation; technology selection tools; contaminant-specific information, guidance and application support; case studies; regulatory development; and publications. |
Cost Estimating Tools and Resources for Addressing the Brownfields Initiatives EPA 625-R-99-001 |
| The guide is one in a series of publications designed to assist communities, states, municipalities, and the private sector to address brownfields sites more effectively. The guide, which is designed to be used with the three guides for specific types of sites Technical Approaches to Characterizing and Cleaning Up Automotive Repair Sites Under the Brownfields Initiative, Technical Approaches to Characterizing and Cleaning Up Iron and Steel Mill Sites Under the Brownfields Initiative, and Technical Approaches to Characterizing and Cleaning Up Metal Finishing Sites Under the Brownfields Initiative provides information about cost estimating tools and resources for addressing cleanup costs at brownfields sites. Many decision-makers at brownfields sites may choose to assign the preparation of cost estimates to consultants who are experienced in the cleanup of hazardous waste sites; however, it benefits those decision-makers to be able to provide guidance to their consultants and to understand the process sufficiently well to provide an informed review of the estimates prepared. The guide provides general information about the cost estimation process and includes summaries of various types of estimates. The guide also outlines the process of developing "order of magnitude" cost estimates. Information about resources, databases, and models also is provided. |
Directory of Technical Assistance for Land Revitalization (BTSC) EPA 542-B-03-001 |
| BTSC has prepared this directory to provide information about technical assistance that is available from federal agencies to assist regional, state, and local government personnel in making assessment and cleanup decisions for brownfields, reuse, and revitalization sites. This directory includes information about 37 organizations within 10 federal agencies that provide different types of support to help with site assessment and cleanup, including technical support and funding sources. Profiles are included for these agencies and organizations and contain the following types of information: background and location information, relevancy to revitalization, description of the areas of expertise available, discussion of the types of services available, types of funding available and eligibility, contact information and the process for requesting assistance, and examples of specific instances in which the organization has previously provided support relevant to site revitalization. Information in the profiles is believed to be current as of March 2003. To help maintain current information, the directory is available as an online searchable database at www.brownfieldstsc.org/directory. |
| EPA REmediation And CHaracterization Innovative Technologies (REACH IT) Online Searchable Database |
| The EPA REACH IT online searchable databases sponsored by EPA's OSRTI, is a service provided free of charge to both users and technology vendors. EPA REACH IT is accessible only through the Internet. This database provides users with comprehensive, up-to-date information about more than 254 characterization technologies and 484 remediation technologies and their applications. It combines information submitted by technology service providers about remediation and characterization technologies with information from EPA, DoD, DOE, and state project managers about sites at which innovative technologies are being deployed. During the preliminary phase of a brownfields project, EPA REACH IT will assist brownfields stakeholders to learn about and become familiar with the range of available cleanup technology options that can be employed during the investigation and the cleanup phases that follow, as well as data about various types of sites. EPA updates all of the information available in the system about every six months. Technology vendors may also add or update information in EPA REACH IT at any time through the Data Entry System or by submitting information by mail. You can search the EPA REACH IT system in several ways. Various search options are available for a user on the home page, including Custom Search; Spotlight; Most Common Searches; Saved Searches; Guided Search; and Vendor, Technology, and Site Index. For questions about whether a technology is eligible for listing in EPA REACH IT, the user may contact the EPA REACH IT help line at (800) 245-4505 or (703) 390-0713 or send an e-mail to epareachit@ttemi.com. |
| Evaluation of Selected Environmental Decision Support Software (DSS) |
| Developed by DOE's Office of Environmental Management, the report evaluates DSS, computer-based systems that facilitate the use of data, models, and structured decision processes in making decisions related to environmental management. The report evaluates 19 such systems through the application of a rating system that favors software that simulates a wide range of environmental problems. It includes a glossary of terms and a statement of the rationale for the selection of various aspects of the performance of the DSS for evaluation. |
Evaluation of Subsurface Engineered Barriers at Waste Sites EPA 542-R-98-005 |
| The report provides a national retrospective analysis of the field performance of barrier systems, as well as information that could be useful in developing guidance on the use and evaluation of such systems. The report contains information about the design, application, and performance of subsurface engineered barriers. |
| Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable Case Studies |
| The case studies provide the user with information about specific characterization and remediation technology optimization applications. Four focus areas have been established by FRTR for providing performance and cost information on technology applications: remediation case study reports, characterization and monitoring case study reports, technology assessment reports, and long-term monitoring/optimization case study reports. FRTR case studies are developed by DoD, USACE, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air Force, DOE, DOI, and EPA. The case studies focus on full-scale and large field demonstration projects and include site background information, technology descriptions, cost and performance information, and lessons learned. The technologies include innovative and conventional treatment technologies for contaminated soil, groundwater, and solid media. Users can search the case studies by groups of contaminants, media, waste management practices that contribute to contamination, and treatment systems. |
Guide to Documenting and Managing Cost and Performance Information for Remediation Projects EPA 542-B-98-007 |
| The document recommends the types of data that should be collected to document the performance and cost of future cleanups. The guide specifies data elements for 13 conventional and innovative cleanup technologies: soil bioventing, soil flushing, soil vapor extraction, groundwater sparging, in situ groundwater remediation, pump-and-treat technologies, composting, incineration, land treatment, slurry-phase soil bioremediation, soil washing, stabilization, and thermal desorption. The document provides site managers with a standard set of parameters for documenting completed remediation projects. A number of federal agencies have made commitments to using the guidance to collect data for full-scale cleanups, demonstrations, and treatability studies. |
Innovative Remediation and Site Characterization Technologies Resources EPA 542-C-04-002 |
| Produced by EPA's OSRTI, this CD-ROM contains resources that provide information to help federal, state, and private sector site managers evaluate site assessment and cleanup alternatives. The ability to gain access to resources that provide information about innovative site characterization and remediation technologies will increase the understanding of those technologies and of the cost and performance factors related to them. Such understanding is essential to consideration of those technologies for use in addressing contamination at hazardous waste sites. The information on the CD-ROM is broken down into seven categories: bulletins, fact sheets, journals, and newsletters; community involvement support; electronic resources; organizations, programs, and partnerships; publication clearinghouses; publications; and regulatory resources. Several resources included on the CD-ROM also are available at the Road Map online. Copies of the CD-ROM can be ordered through NSCEP at P.O. Box 42419, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242-2419 or by calling (800) 490-9198 toll free. |
Innovative Remediation Technologies: Field-Scale Demonstration Projects in North America, 2nd Edition EPA 542-B-00-004 |
| EPA's publication, Completed North American Innovative Technology Demonstration Projects, is available in an online, searchable database of ongoing and completed field demonstrations of innovative remediation technologies sponsored by government agencies working in partnership with private technology developers to bring new technologies into the hazardous waste remediation marketplace. |
Rapid Commercialization Initiative Final Report for an Integrated In Situ Remediation Technology (LasagnaTM) DOE/OR/22459-1 |
| This report describes demonstration results for the Lasagna process, a process which uses established geotechnical methods to install degradation zones in contaminated soil and electrosmosis to move the contaminants back and forth through these zones until treatment is completed. |
| Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 4.0 |
| The document, which was developed by FRTR, is intended to help site remediation project managers to narrow the field of remediation alternatives and identify potentially applicable technologies for more detailed assessment and evaluation before remedy selection. The document is divided into five sections: Introduction, Contaminant Perspectives, Treatment Perspectives, Treatment Technology Profiles, and References. The document summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of innovative and conventional technologies for remediation of soils, sediments, sludges, groundwater, surface water, and air emissions and off-gases; it focuses primarily on demonstrated technologies. Treatment, containment, separation of wastes, and enhanced recovery technologies are covered. Additional information resources also are included. |
Reuse Assessments: A Tool to Implement the Superfund Land Use Directive OSWER Directive 9355.7-06P |
| This memorandum, which was signed on June 4, 2001, by EPA's OERR, presents information that supports the development of assumptions related to future land use when making remedy selection decisions for response actions conducted at Superfund sites. The Reuse Assessment guide, which provides information about the collection and evaluation of information for developing assumptions, and the Superfund Land Use Directive, which provides basic information about developing and using future land use assumptions to support Superfund remedial actions, are included as attachments to the directive. |
Site Remediation Technology InfoBase: A Guide to Federal Programs, Information Resources, and Publications on Contaminated Site Cleanup Technologies, Second Edition EPA 542-B-00-005 |
| Prepared by the member agencies of FRTR, the guide identifies programs, resources, and publications of the federal government related to technologies for the cleanup of contaminated sites. |
| Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: Technology Profiles, Eleventh Edition |
| Developed by EPA's SITE Program, these documents (contained in three volumes) provide profiles of more than 150 demonstration, emerging, and monitoring and measurement technologies currently being evaluated. Each technology profile identifies the developer and process name of the technology, describes the technology, discusses its applicability to waste, and provides a project status report and contact information. The profiles also include summaries of demonstration results, if available. The following volumes are available: |
| – |
Demonstration Program, Volume 1 (EPA 540-R-03-501) |
| – |
Emerging Technology Program, Volume 2 (EPA 540-R-03-501A) |
| – |
Monitoring and Measurement Program, Volume 3 (EPA 540-R-03-501B) |
| TechKnowTM Database |
| Developed by the Global Network of Environment and Technology (GNET), TechKnow is an online, interactive database that allows users to gain access to and provide information about innovative and sustainable technologies. For each technology profiled, a summary, development information, status, and cost is provided. The Internet site also provides contact information for the technologies. Users may access the TechKnow database at www.techknow.org. There is no cost to use TechKnow, but users are required to register on GNET. |
Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report (Eleventh Edition) EPA 542-R-03-009 |
| This report, which was developed by EPA, documents the status and achievements (as of March 2003) of treatment technology applications for soil, other solid wastes, and groundwater at Superfund sites. The data in this report were gathered from Superfund records of decision (ROD) from fiscal years (FY) 1982 through 2002, close-out reports (COR) from FYs 1983 through 2002, and project managers at Superfund remedial action sites. The report examines in situ and ex situ treatment technologies for soil, sludge, sediment, other solid matrix wastes, and NAPLs; in situ and ex situ P&T groundwater treatment technologies; vertical engineered barriers (VEB); and the selection of MNA remedies for groundwater. This edition of the annual status report summarizes 1,811 technology applications identified for Superfund remedial actions. EPA created a searchable, online system to allow access to the data that form the basis for this report. This searchable system is available at http://cfpub.epa.gov/asr/. |
B. Site-Specific Resources for Cleanup Options
Listed below are survey reports on the application of innovative technologies
to specific contaminants and site types.
Air Sparging: Technology Transfer and Multi-Site Evaluation CU-9808 |
| Developed by ESTCP, this document presents an evaluation of the Air Sparging Design Paradigm implemented at 10 field sites. The goal of the study was to determine the effectiveness of the paradigm and to modify it as necessary based on the results of the evaluation. The document explains the technology and demonstration design and provides an assessment of the performance and cost of the technology in field applications. |
Arsenic Treatment Technologies for Soil, Waste, and Water EPA 542-R-02-042 |
| This report, which was prepared by EPA, contains current information on treatment technologies for wastes and environmental media containing arsenic. The intended audience for the report includes hazardous waste site managers, generators and treaters of arsenic-contaminated waste and wastewater, owners and operators of drinking water treatment plants, regulators, and the interested public. The report summarizes information on 13 technologies used to treat arsenic, identifies sites and facilities where arsenic treatment has been used, and provides references to more detailed arsenic treatment information. |
| Assessment of Phytoremediation as an In-Situ Technique for Cleaning Oil-Contaminated Sites |
| The document, which is based on a review of the relevant literature, provides examples of the phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons and discusses the key mechanisms of that process, as well as the special considerations involved in phytoremediation of petrochemicals. The document also discusses the benefits, limitations, and costs of phytoremediation, compared with alternative approaches, including natural attenuation, engineering, and bioremediation. |
Catalog of EPA Materials on USTs EPA 510-B-00-001 |
| The booklet provides an annotated list of UST materials and includes ordering information. Many of the informational leaflets, booklets, videos, and software items listed are designed to provide UST owners and operators with information to help them comply with the federal UST requirements. |
DNAPL Remediation: Selected Projects Approaching Regulatory Closure - Status Update EPA 542-R-04-016 |
| This paper, which was prepared by EPA's OSRTI, is a status update on the use of DNAPL source reduction remedial technologies. The document provides information about recent projects in which regulatory closure has been reached and projects that are approaching regulatory closure following source reduction. Information is presented about the challenges associated with DNAPL remediation and the types of in situ technologies used, and data and findings are included concerning the relative effectiveness of field applications of these technologies. Project profiles for eight field applications are provided that illustrate some of the findings presented in the paper. |
EPA ORD Brownfields Guides - Technical Approaches to Characterizing and Cleaning Up Iron and Steel Mill Sites Under the Brownfields Initiative EPA 625-R-98-007 |
| The Brownfields Guides, which were developed by EPA ORD, are designed to help communities, states, municipalities, and the private sector address brownfields sites more effectively. EPA has developed this "Iron and Steel" guide to provide decision-makers such as city planners, private sector developers, and others involved in redeveloping brownfields with a better understanding of the technical issues involved in assessing and cleaning up iron and steel mill sites so they can make the most informed decisions possible. This guide provides the user with an understanding of common industrial processes at iron and steel mills and the relationship between these processes and potential releases of contaminants to the environment. The guide also includes a discussion of site assessment, screening and cleanup levels, and technologies that can be used to assess and clean up the types of contaminants likely to be present at iron and steel mill sites. A list of relevant acronyms, a glossary of key terms, and an extensive bibliography are also provided. |
EPA ORD Brownfields Guides - Technical Approaches to Characterizing and Cleaning Up Metal Finishing Sites Under the Brownfields Initiative EPA 625-R-98-006 |
| The Brownfields Guides, which were developed by EPA ORD, are designed to help communities, states, municipalities, and the private sector address brownfields sites more effectively. EPA has developed this "Metal Finishing" guide to provide those involved in redeveloping brownfields with a better understanding of the technical issues involved in assessing and cleaning up metal finishing sites so they can make the most informed decisions possible. This guide provides the user with an understanding of common industrial processes at metal finishing facilities and the relationship between these processes and potential releases of contaminants to the environment. It also provides information on the types of contaminants likely to be present at these sites. The guide includes a discussion of a conceptual framework for pathways by which contaminants may migrate off site and environmental and human health concerns to be considered when cleanup options for these sites are evaluated. In addition, a list of relevant acronyms, a glossary of key terms, and an extensive bibliography are provided. |
Groundwater Cleanup: Overview of Operating Experience at 28 Sites EPA 542-R-99-006 |
| The report summarizes information about the groundwater remediation systems at 28 sites throughout the United States at which completed or ongoing groundwater cleanup programs are in place. It includes details about design, operation, and performance of the systems; capital, operating, and unit costs of the systems; and factors that potentially affect the cost and performance of the systems. The report compares and contrasts data from the case studies to assist those involved in evaluating and selecting remedies for groundwater contamination at hazardous waste sites. Of the 28 projects presented in the case studies, 24 are Superfund remedial actions, one is a Superfund removal action, one is a cleanup conducted by state authorities, and two are corrective actions taken under RCRA. The sites represent a range of site types and hydrogeological conditions. |
How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies for Underground Storage Tank Sites: A Guide for Corrective Action Plan Reviewers EPA 510-R-04-002 |
| The guide was developed by EPA to assist state regulators in efficiently and confidently evaluating corrective action plans (CAP) that incorporate alternative technologies. The guide, which was written in nontechnical language, takes the reader through the steps involved in reviewing a CAP. Earlier versions of the guide (1994 and 1995) covered technologies such as SVE, air sparging, biosparging, landfarming, biopiles, bioventing, low-temperature thermal desorption, natural attenuation, dual-phase extraction, and in situ groundwater bioremediation. The revised version (2004) has two new chapters on enhanced aerobic bioremediation and chemical oxidation and two revised chapters: the introduction and a chapter on MNA. Each technology chapter presents a comprehensive description of a technology, an explanation of how it works, and a flow chart that illustrates the decision points in the process; information that will help the regulator evaluate whether a given technology will clean up a given site successfully; a discussion and instructions to help the regulator evaluate whether a CAP is technically sound; a checklist to assist the regulator in determining whether a CAP includes all the steps necessary; and a list of references. |
| Impact of Landfill Closure Designs on Long-Term Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons |
| Developed by ESTCP, this landfill closure evaluation document is intended to help users develop alternative landfill closure designs and management strategies that can enhance the long-term natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents in landfills and landfill leachate-contaminated groundwater. The design approach proposed in this document maximizes the use of natural remediation and management techniques for landfill closures. |
| Innovations in Site Characterization Case Study Series |
| The case studies, which were developed by EPA, provide cost and performance information about the innovative technologies that support less costly and more representative site characterization. The purpose of the case studies is to analyze and document the effectiveness of new technologies proposed for site cleanup. They present information about the capability of the technologies in analyzing and monitoring cleanup, as well as information about costs associated with the use of the technologies. The following case studies are available: |
| – |
Dexsil L2000 PCB/Chloride Analyzer for Drum Surfaces (EPA 542-R-99-003) |
| – |
Geophysical Investigation at Hazardous Waste Sites (EPA 542-R-00-003) |
| – |
Hanscom Air Force Base, Operable Unit 1 (EPA 542-R-98-006) |
| – |
Site Cleanup of the Wenatchee Tree Fruit Test Plot Site Using a Dynamic Work Plan (2000) (EPA 542-R-00-009) |
| – |
Technology Evaluation: Real-time VOC Analysis Using a Field Portable GC/MS (EPA 542-R-01-011) |
| InterAgency DNAPL Consortium Home Page |
| The Web site is sponsored by the Interagency DNAPL Consortium (IDC). IDC is an alliance of five federal agencies, including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), EPA, DOE, the U.S. Navy, and the U.S. Air Force. It reports on the IDC's effort to evaluate and compare the cost and performance of three innovative remediation technologies for the treatment of DNAPLS. The three technologies are being applied for the treatment of trichloroethene (TCE) at Launch Complex 34 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida. The three technologies being demonstrated in side-by-side plots at the launch area are chemical oxidation with the use of potassium permanganate, six-phase heating, and dynamic underground stripping. |
MtBE Fact Sheet #2: Remediation of MtBE-Contaminated Soil and Groundwater EPA 510-F-98-002 |
| Developed by EPA's OUST, the fact sheet describes the physical and chemical characteristics of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MtBE) and identifies alternative technologies for remediating it. |
North Atlantic Treaty Organization/Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society (NATO/CCMS) Pilot Study Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies for the Treatment of Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase III) 2002 Annual Report EPA 542-R-02-010 |
| This document reports on the fourth meeting for the Phase III Pilot Study on the Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies for the Treatment and Clean Up of Contaminated Land and Groundwater. The Phase III study, which concluded in 2002, focused on technologies for treating contaminated land and groundwater. The study addressed issues of sustainability, environmental merit, and cost-effectiveness with continued emphasis on emerging remediation technologies. The objectives of the study were to critically evaluate technologies, promote appropriate use of technologies, use information technology systems to disseminate study products, and foster innovative thinking about contaminated land. |
Resource for MGP Site Characterization and Remediation: Expedited Site Characterization and Source Remediation at Former Manufactured Gas Plant Sites EPA 542-R-00-005 |
| The document provides current information about useful approaches and tools being applied at former MGP sites to the regulators and utilities that are engaged in characterizing and remediating these sites. The document outlines site management strategies and field tools for expediting site characterization at MGP sites; presents a summary of existing technologies for remediating MGP wastes in soils; provides sufficient information about the benefits, limitations, and costs of each technology, tool, or strategy for comparison and evaluation; and provides, through case studies, examples of the ways in which those tools and strategies can be implemented at MGP sites. |
| State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) Internet Site |
| The SCRD Internet site, which is supported by EPA's OSRTI, provides extensive information about state remediation programs and resources related to the remediation of dry cleaner sites. Descriptions of state programs and points of contact in each of the member states are provided. Publications, regulations, and other documents are identified as well. Brownfields stakeholders involved in the assessment and cleanup of dry cleaner sites in Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin may be particularly interested in the detailed information provided about programs in those states. Profiles of the remediation of specific sites throughout the United States are intended to assist users, particularly state officials, in making more informed decisions related to the remediation of sites in their states, and, when possible, to provide additional resources. Publications developed by the SCRD, as well as state and federal resources pertinent to issues associated with dry cleaner sites, can be viewed online or downloaded at no charge. |
| The Bioremediation and Phytoremediation of Pesticide-Contaminated Sites |
| The technology assessment report discusses the use of bioremediation and phytoremediation for the cleanup of sites contaminated with pesticides. It provides information about the current status of the two technologies to federal and state agencies, consulting engineering firms, private industries, and technology developers. |
Treatment Experiences at RCRA Corrective Actions EPA 542-F-00-020 |
| The fact sheet summarizes information about the use of treatment technologies at 30 RCRA corrective action sites. It focuses on ongoing or completed cleanups of contaminated soil or groundwater at RCRA sites for which key information, such as the type of technology used and the point of contact, was available. The sites illustrate the types of cleanups conducted at RCRA corrective action sites; they are not intended to be representative of all cleanups conducted under RCRA. |
Use of Monitored Natural Attenuation at Superfund, RCRA Corrective Action, and Underground Storage Tank Sites OSWER Directive 9200.4-17P |
| The policy directive, which was issued on April 21, 1999, provides guidance to the staff of EPA, the public, and the regulated community on how EPA intends to exercise its discretion in implementing national policy on the use of monitored natural attenuation for the remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater at sites regulated under the programs of EPA's OSWER. |
C. Technology-Specific Resources for
Cleanup Options
The documents listed below provide detailed information about specific
innovative technologies and the application of those processes to specific
contaminants and media in the form of engineering analyses, application
reports, technology verification and evaluation reports, and technology
review.
| A Systematic Approach to In Situ Bioremediation in Groundwater, Including Decision Trees for In Situ Bioremediation of Nitrates, Carbon Tetrachloride, and Perchlorate |
| This document, which was prepared by ITRC, provides guidance for the systematic characterization, evaluation, design, and testing efforts associated with implementing in situ bioremediation (ISB) for a biotreatable contaminant. It serves as guidance for regulators, consultants, responsible parties, and stakeholders when an ISB technology is being considered. This document presents decision trees for reviewing, planning, evaluating, and approving ISB systems for the saturated subsurface and defines site parameters and appropriate ranges of criteria for characterization, testing, design, and monitoring efforts. The information provided in this document will support ISB evaluation. |
| Air Sparging Design Paradigm |
| This design guidance resulted from research and development efforts sponsored by the U.S. Air Force Armstrong Laboratory and the U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Research Center and from field research and data analysis conducted by Battelle Memorial Institute, Arizona State University, Oregon Graduate Institute, Parsons Engineering-Science, and Colorado State University. The guidance provides details on air sparging principles; site characterization; pilot testing; system design, installation, and operation; and system monitoring. Use of the design paradigm is illustrated in descriptions of field studies and by using the results of controlled physical model studies. The guidance is organized in sections that provide an overview of air sparging in general and the specific design paradigm followed by a discussion of site characterization, air sparging application, pilot testing, and system design and monitoring. |
Analysis of Selected Enhancements for Soil Vapor Extraction EPA 542-R-97-007 |
| The report provides an engineering analysis of and status report on, selected enhancements for SVE treatment technologies. The report is intended to assist project managers who are considering an SVE treatment system by providing them with an up-to-date report on the status of enhancement technologies in an evaluation of each technology's applicability to various site conditions, a presentation of cost and performance information, a list of vendors that specialize in the technologies, a discussion of the relative strengths and limitations of the technologies, recommendations of factors to be kept in mind when considering the enhancements, and a compilation of references. The five enhancement technologies discussed in the report are air sparging, dual-phase extraction, directional drilling, pneumatic and hydraulic fracturing, and thermal enhancement. |
| This application guide, which was developed by Battelle for NFESC, is presented in two volumes. Volume I provides principles and practices of bioslurping to assist project managers in preliminary decision-making. Based on Volume I, a site manager may determine whether this technology is feasible for a site contaminated with light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL). |
| This application guide, which was developed by Battelle for the Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC), is presented in two volumes. Volume I provides principles and practices of bioslurping to assist project managers in preliminary decision-making, and Volume II contains a detailed description of the bioslurper system; testing procedures; system design, installation, operation, and monitoring; and an approach for site closure. |
| Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvent Contaminated Groundwater |
| The report is intended to provide a basic summary of in situ treatment technologies for groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents. It includes information gathered from a range of currently available sources, including project documents, reports, periodicals, Internet searches, and personal communication with parties involved in the use of the technologies. |
Brownfields Technology Primer: Requesting and Evaluating Proposals that Encourage Innovative Technologies for Investigation and Cleanup EPA 542-R-01-005 |
| See also: |
http://brownfieldstsc.org/pubs02.cfm |
| BTSC prepared this primer to assist site owners, project managers, and others preparing RFPs to solicit support in conducting activities to investigate and clean up contaminated sites. It is specifically intended to assist those individuals in writing specifications that encourage contractors and technology vendors to propose options for using innovative characterization and remediation technologies at brownfields sites. The primer also provides information, from a technology perspective, to guide review teams in their evaluations of proposals and the selection of qualified contractors. |
Brownfields Technology Primer: Selecting and Using Phytoremediation for Site Cleanup EPA 542-R-01-006 |
| BTSC developed this document to provide an educational tool for site owners, project managers, and regulators to help evaluate the applicability of the phytoremediation process at brownfields sites. The primer explains the types of biological processes involved in phytoremediation; provides examples of the sites and contaminants where phytoremediation has been applied; and discusses technical considerations in selecting and designing phytoremediation systems, activities necessary to operate and maintain phytoremediation systems, and examples of estimated potential cost savings from using phytoremediation versus more conventional treatment processes. The primer also provides a comprehensive list of other resources that are available to assist decision-makers in evaluating phytoremediation as an option for cleaning up contaminated sites. |
Capstone Report on the Application, Monitoring, and Performance of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Ground-Water Remediation: Volume 1 EPA 600-R-03-045a |
| This report, which was developed by EPA, discusses geochemical and microbiological processes within zero-valent iron PRBs that may contribute to changes in iron reactivity over time and decreases in reaction zone permeability. Two full-scale PRBs are evaluated in this report. Detailed water sampling and analysis, core sampling, and solid-phase characterization studies were carried out to: (1) evaluate spatial and temporal trends in contaminant concentrations and key geochemical parameters, (2) characterize the type and nature of surface precipitates forming over time in the reactive barriers, and (3) identify the type and extent of microbiological activity within and around the reactive barriers. |
Capstone Report on the Application, Monitoring, and Performance of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Ground-Water Remediation: Volume 2 EPA 600-R-03-045b |
| This report, which was developed by EPA, discusses soil and groundwater sampling methods and procedures used to evaluate the long-term performance of PRBs at two sites: one in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, and the other one in Denver Federal Center near Lakewood, Colorado. Both PRBs were installed in 1996 and have been monitored and studied since their installation to determine their continued effectiveness in removing contaminants from groundwater. The report points out that an effective monitoring program requires appropriate soil and groundwater sampling techniques. |
| CLU-IN Technology Focus |
| The Technology Focus, a section of EPA OSRTI's CLU-IN site, provides a compilation of the most relevant information sources for a range of remediation technologies. Grouped by specific technologies, the resources provide technology descriptions, information about applications and use of technologies, relevant engineering and regulatory guidance, and links to training sources and additional references. Information about the following technologies is available: air sparging, bioreactor landfills, bioremediation of chlorinated solvents, bioventing and biosparging, electrokinetics, fracturing, groundwater circulating wells, in situ flushing, in situ oxidation, multiphase extraction, natural attenuation, PRBs, phytoremediation, solvent extraction, SVE, soil washing, thermal desorption, and thermal enhancements. |
Cost Analyses for Selected Groundwater Cleanup Projects: Pump-and-Treat Systems and Permeable Reactive Barriers EPA 542-R-00-013 |
| Developed on the basis of case studies prepared by EPA, other members of FRTR, and the Remediation Technologies Development Forum, the report presents the results of an analysis of groundwater cleanup costs for P&T systems and PRBs at 48 sites. Targeted for site managers, technology developers, and users, as well as others involved in groundwater remediation efforts, the report provides detailed information about the costs of groundwater cleanup technologies and factors that affect those costs. Of the 48 sites, 32 had P&T systems and 16 had PRBs. |
Engineered Approaches to In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents: Fundamentals and Field Applications EPA 542-R-00-008 |
| The report provides an overview of in situ bioremediation for the remediation of chlorinated solvents in contaminated soil and groundwater. It describes mechanisms for the degradation of chlorinated solvents, enhancements of such mechanisms by the addition of various materials and chemicals, design approaches, and factors to consider when selecting and using the technology. The report also presents a list of vendors of the technology and nine case studies of field applications. |
Engineering and Design: Adsorption Design Guide DG 1110-1-2 |
| The guide, published by USACE, provides practical guidance for the design of liquid- and vapor-phase devices for the adsorption of organic chemicals. The adsorptive media addressed include granular activated carbon (GAC) and other alternative adsorption media, such as powdered activated carbon (PAC) and non-carbon adsorbents. It addresses various types of adsorption media, applicability, use of various adsorption process technologies, design of equipment and ancillary components, availability, advantages, disadvantages, regeneration methods, costs, and safety considerations. |
Engineering and Design: Soil Vapor Extraction and Bioventing EM 1110-1-4001 |
| This guide, which was published by USACE to provide practical guidance for design and operation of SVE and bioventing (BV) systems. It discusses all aspects of the engineering of SVE and BV systems, including site characterization, technology selection; bench- and pilot-scale testing, design, installation, operation, and closure. |
| EPA's Office of Underground Storage Tanks Internet Site |
| Hosted by EPA's OUST, the Internet site provides resources and tools to assist owners and operators of USTs and brownfields stakeholders to better assess their options for the operation, maintenance, and cleanup of USTs. Information and guidance about technologies suitable for cleaning up releases from UST systems are provided, as well as details about current federal UST regulations and UST program priorities, including specific details about the USTFields Initiative. Points of contact in each of the EPA regional offices also are identified. An extensive number of UST publications can be viewed online or downloaded at no charge. In addition, information about state-sponsored UST programs, including links to state Internet sites, is provided on OUST's site at www.epa.gov/swerust1/states/index.htm. |
Evaluation of Performance and Longevity at Permeable Reactive Barrier Sites CU-9907 |
| Developed by ESTCP, this report presents an evaluation of short- and long-term performance issues associated with PRBs installed at several DoD sites. The report assesses the longevity of PRBs made from iron and the hydraulic performance of various PRBs in terms of their ability to meet groundwater capture zone and residence time requirements. The report describes PRB technology and provides an assessment of the performance and cost of the technology when implemented in the field. It also addresses implementation issues such as scale-up, regulatory constraints, and monitoring. |
| Evaluation of Permeable Reactive Barrier Performance - Revised Report |
| This document, which was prepared for FRTR by DoD, DOE, and EPA, summarizes field performance evaluations of several PRBs installed at sites under the purview of DoD, DOE, and EPA. The evaluations focus on the longevity and hydraulic performance of the PRBs in various geologic settings. The results of these studies are being provided to RPMs at government-owned sites to aid in decision-making. The document also discusses compliance and monitoring issues related to PRBs. |
Evaluation of Phytoremediation for Management of Chlorinated Solvents in Soil and Groundwater EPA 542-R-05-001 |
| This document, prepared by the RTDF, is designed to briefly introduce various phytotechnologies; identify potential applications of phytoremediation to control, transform, or manage chlorinated solvents in soil and groundwater; show how to conduct a preliminary assessment to determine if a particular site is a good candidate for phytoremediation; and describe monitoring options and show how to assess the effectiveness of phytoremediation at full-scale field implementation. It is intended to aid regulators, site owners, consultants, and other stakeholders in understanding the proper application of phytotechnology to remediate groundwater contaminated with halogenated solvents. |
Evapotranspiration Landfill Cover Systems Fact Sheet EPA 542-F-03-015 |
| This fact sheet, which was prepared by EPA, provides a summary of an innovative landfill final cover design called evapotranspiration (ET) covers. The information in this fact sheet was obtained from currently available technical literature and from discussions with site managers. The general ET cover concept involves use of one or more vegetated soil layers to retain water until it is either transpired through vegetation or evaporated from the soil surface. The fact sheet discusses general considerations of ET cover design, performance, monitoring, cost, status, and limitations and provides project-specific examples. Final cover systems are used as part of the remediation and final closure for landfills, contaminated areas at or near the ground surface, and other waste disposal sites. As of September 2003, ET covers have been proposed, tested, or installed at 64 sites throughout the United States, generally from Georgia to Oregon. |
Field Applications of In Situ Remediation Technologies: Chemical Oxidation EPA 542-R-98-008 |
| The document describes recent pilot demonstrations and full-scale applications of chemical oxidation processes that treat soil and groundwater in place or increase the solubility and mobility of contaminants to improve their removal by other remediation technologies. |
Field Applications of In Situ Remediation Technologies: Ground-Water Circulation Wells EPA 542-R-98-009 |
| The report is one in a series of reports that document recent pilot demonstrations and full-scale applications that treat soil and groundwater in situ or increase the solubility and mobility of contaminants to improve their removal by other remediation technologies. It is hoped that the information provided will facilitate more frequent consideration of new, less costly, and more effective technologies to address the problems associated with hazardous waste sites and petroleum contamination. |
Field Applications of In Situ Remediation Technologies: Permeable Reactive Barriers EPA 542-R-99-002 |
| One of a series of reports that summarize pilot demonstrations and full-scale applications of technologies that treat soil and groundwater, the document presents profiles of a number of applications of PRBs. Each profile identifies, to the extent the information is available, the name of the site, its location, its characteristics, the principal contaminants present, the installation date of the PRB, the type of construction, the costs of design and construction, the reactive materials used, and the results achieved. The profiles also discuss lessons learned and lists a point of contact for obtaining further information. A bibliography of articles and documents related to PRBs also is included. |
Geophysical Techniques to Locate DNAPLs: Profiles of Federally Funded Projects EPA 542-R-98-020 |
| The document provides to researchers and practitioners a status report on federal projects that are using noninvasive geophysical techniques to locate DNAPLs in the subsurface. |
Groundwater Pump and Treat Systems: Summary of Selected Cost and Performance Information at Superfund-Financed Sites EPA 542-R-01-021a and EPA 542-R-01-021b |
| This report, which was published by EPA, summarizes Phase 1 (the data collection phase) of the Nationwide Fund-lead Pump and Treat Optimization Project. The first phase of this project identified a total of 88 Fund-lead (EPA-lead and state-lead with Fund money) P&T systems within the Superfund Program. System identification was accomplished through use of online databases and discussions with project liaisons in each region. The number of Fund-lead P&T systems in EPA regions ranged from zero in Region 8 to 22 in Region 2. The report identifies the 88 Fund-lead P&T systems, summarizes the information submitted by RPMs, and presents the screening and selection of those systems to receive remediation system evaluations (RSE). The EPA 542-R-01-021a report does not contain data appendices. The "b" version of the report includes all appendices. |
| Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Technology Reports |
| Developed by the Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center (GWRTAC), various reports about groundwater technologies and how they work are available to assist decision-makers in reviewing technology options and assessing a technology's applicability to a particular site. The Technical Overview Reports are intended to provide general overviews of and introductions to selected groundwater technologies. More detailed information and technical analyses are provided in the Technical Evaluation Reports. Each of these reports provides a comprehensive description of a specific technology, performance information, information about its applicability and cost, a discussion of regulatory and policy requirements and issues, and a summary of lessons learned. The Technology Status Reports are summary documents that provide information about the status of and current development efforts for specific emerging groundwater technologies or address related topics. Examples of some of the topics covered include air sparging, chlorinated solvents, DNAPL remediation, electrokinetics, hydraulic and pneumatic fracturing, in situ bioremediation, in situ chemical treatment, in situ soil flushing, permeable reactive wells, phytoremediation, groundwater circulation wells, in situ S/S, in situ vitrification, LNAPL remediation, perchlorate remediation, remediation of metals, SVE and dual -phase extraction, thermal enhancements, and treatment trains. |
Groundwater Remedies Selected at Superfund Sites EPA 542-R-01-022 |
| EPA prepared this report to document the selection of groundwater treatment and MNA remedies for Superfund remedial action sites. The report presents data on groundwater treatment and MNA remedy decisions and analyzes trends in these decisions over time. The focus of this report is on groundwater treatment and MNA remedies that result in reduction of contaminant concentrations or mobility. Groundwater containment and other remedies are not addressed in this report. |
Hydraulic Optimization Demonstration for Groundwater Pump-and-Treat Systems EPA 542-R-99-011A |
| The report, contained in two separate volumes, presents a screening analysis that users can use to determine whether they can achieve significant cost savings by altering key aspects of an existing or planned P&T system. The first volume, intended for a broad audience, describes the screening analysis, which uses spreadsheets to allow quick and inexpensive cost comparison of alternatives under consideration for use at a site, in terms of net present value (NPV). The second volume, intended for a more technical audience, provides case study examples of the application of hydraulic optimization at three sites. Site-specific factors, as well as the steps involved to conduct the analysis, are described in detail. The following volumes are available: |
| – |
Volume I: Pre-Optimization Screening Method and Demonstration (EPA 542-R-99-011A) |
| – |
Volume II: Application of Hydraulic Optimization (EPA 542-R-99-011B) |
In Situ Electrokinetic Remediation of Metal Contaminated Soils Technology Status Report SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-99022 |
| The report, which was published by the U.S. Army Environmental Center for ESTCP, provides an overview of the current developmental status of electrokinetic remediation for metals-contaminated soils. The report identifies concerns about the in situ application of the technology and issues that require further investigation. It also presents the results of a field demonstration conducted at Naval Air Weapons Station at Point Mugu to illustrate concerns about the in situ application of the technology at its current stage of development. |
In Situ Treatment of Chlorinated Solvents: Fundamentals and Field Applications EPA 542-R-04-010 |
| This report, which was prepared by EPA, contains information about the use of in situ thermal treatment technologies to treat chlorinated solvents in source zones containing free-phase contamination or high concentrations of contaminants that are either sorbed to soil or dissolved in groundwater in the saturated or unsaturated zone. The information in this report may be helpful to site managers, site owners, treatment technology vendors, regulators, consulting firms, and others involved in the cleanup of sites contaminated with chlorinated solvents. The report describes three in situ thermal technologies: steam-enhanced extraction, electrical resistive heating, and electrical conductive heating. The report also discusses overall applicability issues and engineering considerations for the use of these technologies in the field. |
| In Situ Treatment of Contaminated Sediments |
| The document provides a technology assessment about in situ treatment technologies applicable for cleanup of contaminated sediments. It is intended to provide federal agencies, states, consulting engineering firms, private industries, and technology developers with information on the current status of this technology. |
Introduction to Phytoremediation EPA 600-R-99-107 |
| The document provides a tool for regulators, owners, neighbors, and managers to use in evaluating the applicability of phytoremediation to a site. The document defines terms and provides a framework for use in developing an understanding of phytoremediation applications. It is a compilation of information obtained through research and remediation work that has been done to date. |
| ITRC Phytoremediation Decision Tree |
| The document, which was produced by the ITRC workgroup, provides a tool that can be used to determine whether phytoremediation can be effective at a given site. It is designed to complement existing phytoremediation documents. It allows the user to use basic information about a specific site, through a flow chart layout, to decide whether phytoremediation is feasible at that site. |
Leak Detection for Landfill Liners: Overview of Tools for Vadose Zone Monitoring EPA 542-R-98-019 |
| The report provides a basic summary of tools in current use for detection of leaks in landfill liners. It includes information gathered from a range of currently available sources, including project documents, reports, periodicals, Internet searches, and personal communication with parties involved in such efforts. |
Long-Term Performance of Permeable Reactive Barriers Using Zero-Valent Iron: An Evaluation at Two Sites (Environmental Research Brief) EPA 600-S-02-001 |
| This environmental research brief, which was developed by EPA ORD, presents findings over the past 4 years at two sites where detailed EPA investigations have focused on the long-term performance of PRBs. The document also examines the field performance of multiple PRBs across the United States. |
Monitored Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents EPA 600-F-98-022 |
| The fact sheet, which was written for a nonscientific audience and intended to assist federal, state, and local regulators in educating the public about complex environmental issues, explains what the term "monitored natural attenuation" means when it is used to describe a potential strategy for remediating a contaminated site. It also describes the various physical, chemical, and biological processes of natural attenuation that may take place at a site contaminated with chlorinated solvents and explains how decision-makers evaluate the role of MNA at a contaminated site. |
Monitored Natural Attenuation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons EPA 600-F-98-021 |
| The fact sheet, which was written for a nonscientific audience and intended to assist federal, state, and local regulators in educating the public about complex environmental issues, explains what the term "monitored natural attenuation" (MNA) means when it is used to describe a potential strategy for remediating a contaminated site. It also describes the various physical, chemical, and biological processes of natural attenuation that may take place at a site contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons and explains how decision-makers evaluate the role of MNA at a contaminated site. |
| MtBE Treatment Profiles |
| This Web site is sponsored jointly by EPA's OSRTI and OUST. The searchable Web site contains data on almost 400 completed and ongoing applications of MtBE treatment for drinking water and contaminated media. The treatment profiles describe sites at which technologies (both in situ and ex situ/aboveground) have been used to treat MtBE in groundwater, soil, and drinking water. The technologies include air stripping and sparging, carbon adsorption, bioremediation (in situ and ex situ), in situ chemical oxidation, SVE and dual-phase extraction, and P&T. The profiles include active links to 18 case studies that present more in-depth information about the treatment sites. EPA encourages project managers, site owners, and technology vendors to add new MtBE treatment profiles to the Web site. Once information is provided, it may be updated to add more recent data, add data for more fields, or correct errors in existing data. |
Multi-Phase Extraction: State of the Practice EPA 542-R-99-004 |
| The report describes the use of multi-phase extraction (MPE) for the remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater, focusing primarily on the application of MPE at sites at which contamination with halogenated VOCs is present. The report describes MPE technology and the various configurations used for it, indicates the types of site conditions to which MPE is applicable, and discusses the advantages and potential limitations of the use of MPE at such sites. In addition, the report provides information about vendors of MPE and case studies that summarize cost and performance data on applications of the technology at three sites. |
| Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater: Principles and Practices |
| The industrial members of the Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Consortium (bioconsortium) of the RTDF prepared the document to disseminate up-to-date scientific information about natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents. The mission of the RTDF bioconsortium is to accelerate the development of cost-effective bioremediation processes for degrading chlorinated solvents and to achieve public and regulatory acceptance of those processes as safe and effective. The document provides a framework to be used in evaluating natural attenuation of chlorinated VOCs. |
Natural Attenuation of MtBE in the Subsurface under Methanogenic Conditions EPA 600-R-00-006 |
| The document presents a case study conducted at the former Fuel Farm Site at the U.S. Coast Guard Support Center at Elizabeth City, North Carolina. The case study is intended to answer several questions: Can MtBE be biodegraded under methanogenic conditions in groundwater that was contaminated by a fuel spill? Will biodegradation produce lower concentrations of MtBE than those required under regulatory standards? Is the rate of degradation in the laboratory adequate to explain the distribution of MtBE in the groundwater at the field site? What is the relationship between the degradation of MtBE and the degradation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) compounds? What is the rate of natural attenuation at the source area? |
| Overview of the Phytoremediation of Lead and Mercury |
| The report assesses the current state of phytoremediation as an innovative technology and discusses its usefulness and potential in the remediation of lead- and mercury-contaminated soils found at hazardous waste sites. The advantages and disadvantages, limitations, current status, projected market, and environmental concerns associated with this new and innovative technology are discussed. Case studies involving the phytoremediation of lead and mercury detailing bench and full-scale projects are also provided. |
Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for Contaminant Remediation EPA 600-R-98-125 |
| The document provides information about PRBs in terms of treatable contaminants, designs, feasibility studies, and construction options. Summaries of several current installations also are provided. |
| Permeable Reactive Barriers for Inorganics |
| The report provides a summary of information about PRBs for inorganics and a discussion of the current status of such barriers. It contains information gathered from a range of currently available sources, including project documents, reports, periodicals, the Internet, and personal communication with parties involved in projects that use the barriers. |
Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Ground Water at Hazardous Waste Sites EPA 540-S-01-005 |
| The issue paper was developed for the EPA Regional Ground Water Forum. The paper provides a concise discussion of the processes associated with the use of phytoremediation as a cleanup or containment technique for remediation of hazardous waste sites, sediment, groundwater, surface water, and wastewater. |
Phytoremediation Resource Guide EPA 542-B-99-003 |
| The document aids decision-makers in reviewing the applicability of phytoremediation extraction treatment technologies. The document also provides access information on electronic resources and hotlines; cites relevant federal regulations; and provides abstracts of more than 100 pertinent resources, such as bibliographies, guidance documents, workshop proceedings, overview documents, study and test results, and test designs and protocols. Included is a phytoremediation treatment technology resource matrix that compares the documents by technology type, affected media, and contaminants. The guide also provides detailed information on how to obtain the publications listed. |
| Phytotechnology Technical and Regulatory Guidance (Phyto-2) |
| The document, which was published by ITRC, provides technical and regulatory guidance to help regulators understand, evaluate, and make informed decisions about phytotechnology proposals. The document includes a description of phytotechnologies and discussions of regulatory and policy issues, technical requirements for phytotechnologies, and concerns on the part of stakeholders. It also provides case studies and technical references. |
Proven Alternatives for Aboveground Treatment of Arsenic in Groundwater EPA 542-S-02-002 |
| This issue paper, which was developed for EPA's Engineering Forum, identifies and summarizes experiences with proven aboveground treatment alternatives for arsenic in groundwater and provides information on their relative effectiveness and cost. The four technologies included in the report are precipitation/coprecipitation, adsorption, ion exchange, and membrane filtration. The report describes the theory and operation of each technology, provides available project-specific performance and cost data, and discusses limitations. The report also discusses special considerations for retrofitting systems to meet the lower arsenic maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 micrograms per liter (µg/L). |
Remediation Technology Cost Compendium - Year 2000 EPA 542-R-01-009 |
| This cost compendium, which was prepared by EPA's OSRTI, captures current information about the costs of the following six remediation technologies: (1) bioremediation, (2) thermal desorption, (3) SVE, (4) on-site incineration, (5) groundwater P&T systems, and (6) PRBs. Cost data were obtained from federal agency sources, including case studies and reports prepared by the FRTR; DOE's Los Alamos National Laboratory; the USACE Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Center for Expertise; and the U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE). The report includes six sections, each of which describes the cost analysis for one of the six technologies. Each of the sections includes a brief description of the technology, a discussion of the methodology used in the cost analysis, and the results of the cost analysis. |
Solidification/Stabilization Use at Superfund Sites EPA 542-R-00-010 |
| The report provides to interested stakeholders, such as project managers, technology service providers, consulting engineers, site owners, and the general public, the most recent information about S/S applications at Superfund sites as well as information about trends in the use of the technology, specific types of applications, and costs. |
| Study of Assessment and Remediation Technologies for Dry Cleaner Sites |
| Prepared by SCRD, with the support of EPA's OSRTI, the report presents the results of the Coalition's evaluation of assessment and remediation technologies commonly used in cleaning up dry cleaner sites. The evaluation was based on the results of responses to questionnaires sent to entities involved in such cleanups in 1999. The report presents those results in detail. An appendix in the report provides descriptions and brief evaluations of assessment technologies frequently used at dry cleaner sites. |
| Subsurface Containment and Monitoring Systems: Barriers and Beyond (Overview Report) |
| The document provides a summary of information about subsurface barriers vertical and horizontal with an emphasis on emerging and innovative vertical barrier technologies. It also presents a discussion of the current status of such barriers. The report is not intended to be inclusive; it merely provides an overview of the current work in the field on subsurface barrier technologies drawn from information gathered from a range of sources, including project documents, reports, periodicals, the Internet, and personal communication with parties involved in projects that use such barriers. |
Subsurface Remediation: Improving Long-Term Monitoring and Remedial Systems Performance Conference Proceedings, June 1999 EPA 540-B-00-002 |
| The document, which was compiled by EPA's OSRTI, summarizes the presentations made and workshops conducted during a conference on improving long-term monitoring (LTM) and the performance of remedial systems. The conference, sponsored and developed by FRTR, took place in St. Louis, Missouri, from June 8 through 11, 1999. The conference provided up-to-date information about LTM and system optimization through presentations and topical workshops. |
Surfactant-Enhanced Aquifer Remediation (SEAR) Implementation Manual TR-2219-ENV |
| This implementation manual, which was prepared by Intera Inc. and NFESC, is designed to familiarize RPMs, engineers, and scientists working on environmental remediation projects with the major tasks and planning parameters involved in implementing an in situ surfactant flood or SEAR project to remove DNAPLs. The manual is intended to help users understand basic design and implementation issues, attain remedial objectives, and follow risk management methodologies and approaches in order to avoid misapplication of surfactant flooding for DNAPL removal. |
| Technical and Regulatory Guidance for Surfactant/Cosolvent Flushing of DNAPL Source Zones |
| This guidance, which was prepared by ITRC, provides technical and regulatory information for those involved in selecting and implementing surfactant and cosolvent flushing as a remedial action for DNAPLs. The guidance describes the technology and discusses the major factors that need to be considered in evaluating design and implementation work plans for surfactant and cosolvent flushing of DNAPLs. |
| Technical and Regulatory Requirements for Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater |
| The report, which was published by ITRC, describes enhanced in situ bioremediation (EISB) and examines the circumstances under which its application is appropriate. It also discusses related regulatory and policy issues, such as the ban under RCRA on land disposal and technical requirements for implementation of EISB. |
Technologies for Treating MtBE and Other Fuel Oxygenates EPA 542-R-04-009 |
| This report, which was developed by EPA's OSRTI, provides an overview of the treatment technologies used to remediate groundwater, soil, and drinking water contaminated with MtBE and other fuel oxygenates. The treatment methods discussed include air sparging, SVE, MPE, in situ and ex situ bioremediation, in situ chemical oxidation, P&T, and drinking water treatment. Information in the report can be used to help evaluate these technologies based on their effectiveness at specific sites. The report summarizes available performance and cost information for these technologies, provides examples of where each has been used, and identifies additional sources of information. |
| Technology Status Review: In Situ Oxidation |
| This report, which was published by ESTCP, provides a survey of sites where in situ oxidation (ISO) has been used. The overall objective of the project summarized in the report was to assess the current status of ISO and determine what additional information is needed to understand the site conditions for which ISO is appropriate. |
| Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program |
| The federal UIC Program works with state and local governments to prevent contamination of drinking water resources caused by the underground injection of waste. Among the wastes the UIC program regulates are more than nine billion gallons of hazardous waste every year; more than two billion gallons of brine from oil and gas operations every day; and automotive, industrial, sanitary and other wastes that are injected into shallow aquifers. |
Use of Field-Scale Phytotechnology for Chlorinated Solvents, Metals, Explosives/ Propellants and Pesticides - Status Update EPA 542-R-05- 002 |
| This status report, which was published by EPA OSRTI, provides information about 79 phytotechnology projects conducted at sites in the United States and Canada, including Superfund sites and federal and military sites that are being addressed under state, local, or voluntary cleanup programs. These projects involved treatment of soil or groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents, metals, explosives and propellants, and pesticides. The document is meant to be a networking tool for federal, state, and industrial employees to share lessons learned from and practical experiences with field-scale applications of phytotechnology. |
| Where Do We Go from Here? |
 |
After you have reviewed options for cleanup, you may take any of the
following courses of action:
| Result
of the Review of Cleanup Options |
|
Course
of Action |
| The
proposed cleanup option appears feasible. |
 |
Proceed to the Cleanup Design and Implementation
phase. |
| No
cleanup option appears feasible in light of the proposed redevelopment
and land reuse needs (such as project milestones and cost and intended
reuse). |
 |
Determine
whether revising the redevelopment plan remains a practicable option;
if so, proceed to the Cleanup
Design and Implementation phase. If contamination exists at considerable
levels, compliance with other programs, such as RCRA
and Superfund,
may be required. |
|